Shots of statues from a local cemetery. Saw them while driving home and thought I would get a few photos of them.
Over at the PetaPixel blog they highlighted a recent Onion article that I think, for some of us, hits really close to home as weekend/part-time photographers. I got a chuckle and a bit of sadness after reading and thinking to myself that it is talking about me!
You can read the article here.
Thanks for reading
Here are some shutter speeds that will give you good starting points for stopping or freezing motion.
The speeds listed assume your subject almost fills the whole frame and is moving horizontally. If the subject you are trying to capture is moving in a diagonal motion or only fills about half or less of the frame then you can cut the speeds by about half.
|Subject||Est. Mph||Shutter Speed|
|Person Walking (Slow)||2||1/250|
|Person Walking (Fast)||3-4||1/500|
|Person Riding Bike||15||1/2000|
|Person Bike Racing||30||1/4000|
|Plane Take Off/Landing||125||1/8000|
Thank for reading
In last week’s blog post “There Is No Magic Lens” I said I would post a list of lenses that you can get without braking your bank account (well…without breaking it too much… let’s face it photography is expensive even for the cheaper stuff!).
I am a canon user. Therefore this post talks about Canon lenses. If you use a different camera system this post may still be helpful for the size of lenses but you will have to do a bit of research on what actual lens you can buy to match what I discuss below.
If you go and Google/Bing for information on what lenses to buy first with your new Canon camera you will find lots of answers and advice out there for you to follow. All of it pretty good too. I know I especially followed this post over on the Wire Cutter Blog. I agree with most everything the author Tim Barribeau said in the article and this post is almost the same advice as what he listed but I do have some minor tweaks that I would like to give in my list.
First, I am assuming you have one of Canon’s Crop Sensor (APS-C) cameras such as T3i (600D), T4i (650D), 60D, or 7D.
Second I am also assuming you are like me and are not going to move to a full framed camera anytime soon unless you win the lottery or your professional photography careers takes off so well your pictures pay for the upgrade. With this in mind though you should know the difference between EF and EF-S lenses.
Here is a quick review if you do not know the difference (Google/Bing the difference for more in depth reading on the subject):
EF-S lenses can only be used on crop sensor cameras. You can not use them on full framed camera ever and you can do a lot of harm to the full framed camera sensor if you try.
EF lens can fit on both types of cameras. This means that any EF lens you buy can be used on a full framed camera you buy later.
Lastly before I start I want to point out that I have listed different lenses for each category. I wanted to list different price options to give you choices to think about. Note Prices are rounded to the nearest dollar and come from what is listed at Amazon.com at the time I originally wrote this post**.
So with that out of the way here is my list of lenses in order I think is you should pick them up in to get the most use out of them.
The first lens you pick up is actually determined on whether you purchased your camera with a kit lens or not. If you do have a kit lens (either the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II or EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS) then you can skip the Standar Zoom lens section (unless you are looking to upgrade yours) I list and go right to the Prime lenses I list.
If you were like me and bought only the body of your camera so you could spend money on a better starting lens then my first recommendation is to get a standard zoom lens over anything else. The reason I say this is because I am assuming you want to start using your camera without much hassle*. I strongly feel that this type of lens will work for most any situation you come across. It will also make it easier to learn and get use to your camera. Honestly while learning photography you do not need more than either one of the kit lenses listed above or one of these I will list below.
Since we are skipping the purchase of a kit lens here are two standard zooms I think work great as a first lens**:
First off we have the EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM at $649 it is not cheap but it is highly versatile for a lens. This was my first lens and I got a lot of use out of it when walking around outside. It has good range and with the wide end at 15mm it makes a great landscape lens with the longer end of 85mm being OK for portraits as well. It is a very versatile lens even though it is not a fast lens. You will definitely need a flash with it indoors for some shots where the available light is not the best. When I owned this lens I really liked it when I did photo walks in Milwaukee on my lunch breaks downtown. I only got rid of it to pay for my 70-200mm lens I talk about later on.
For a more expensive option (if you have the money to spare) there is the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM at $1039. I currently own this lens and it is my everyday lens. I use it everywhere and even shot a wedding with it. This lens is remarkably sharp and is the best lens you can buy that is specifically for Canon’s APS-C sensor. The glass inside is very close to L quality. Hence almost twice the price of the EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. If you have the money I would suggest getting this lens. Even if you upgrade to a full framed camera this lens on a crop body will give you the same stunning results as the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM on a 5D Mark III or 1Dx camera. So you can still get use out of this lens when using your older crop camera as a second body.
Prime lenses are also great for learning photography. Especially for learning to compose and frame your shots. This is because prime lenses have a fix focal length and force you to move to either get closer or farther away. I love my 50mm prime and it is often the first prime others will tell you to buy. People suggest this as a first purchase because you can get them super cheap and still get great images out of it. However depending on what type of pictures you take more of, I would suggest possibly getting a 35mm prime first instead.
I say this because I’ve found that the 50mm on a crop sensor is sometimes has a too long focal length and you can’t always back up enough to frame the shot especially when indoors in small spaces. This is a frustration I have run into enough times (especially in winter when stuck indoors) so I am looking at later this year of getting a 35mm myself. Outdoors though the 50mm has been great to use when walking around.
Keep in mind too that on a crop sensor cameras that a 50mm lens has essentially the same focal length view as a 85mm lens on a full framed sensor. With this in mind the 50mm is still a great buy if you do portraits as it will give you great results for the “pennies” (comparability to the cost of other lenses) you spend on it. Note though on a crop sensor if you really love the look that a 50mm lens gives in photos from a full framed camera then you need to go for the 35mm prime. In the end though you really can’t go wrong with either lens. It’s all a matter of taste and what you want to or will do with them that should be your deciding factor on which to buy.
If you decided to go with a 50mm lens you have two options. First there is the EF 50mm f/1.8 II at about $110 (see I told you it is cheap!). I own this lens and can say do not let its price fool you. It can still produce stunning shots. If you have a little more money to use then I would suggest you grab the EF 50mm f/1.4 USM at $339. Both are great but the f/1.4 is a little bit better.
If you decided to get the 35mm lens you are a bit stuck on options. There is only the EF 35mm f/2 at $289. The next step up in a 35mm lens is the EF 35mm f/1.4L USM at $1329! It is a great lens but this list is to keep each option more affordable while first getting into photography.
For the next lenses there really is no order for what one to get next. It starts to fall into more or less what you need to go along with what you typically are shooting the most. If you do a lot of inside still life and like to shoot close ups of flowers, plants, bugs or products, items, food you may want to get a Macro lens next. If you are trying to get better shots at sporting events of your kids or like to shoot animals at the zoo the telephoto should be your next purchase. If you take a lot of landscapes then a wide angle lens maybe the next one to get. It really comes down to which one will you use the most right away in the end.
Personally for me it was the telephoto zoom and wide angle lenses as next purchases. I’m putting off getting a macro lens until later this year as I have not done that kind of photography yet.
Also have just purchased my first telephoto zoom lens and wide angle lens. I have not had a chance to use it at the time of this writing***.
With this in mind the next parts will be briefer and mainly give you options on what you can purchase without much of my opinion.
Telephoto zooms allow you to get closer to your subject with out physically moving closer. Unfortunately these lenses are always expensive even for a “low cost” one.
There is one really cheap zoom that if you need something right now and do not care about image quality you can pick up the EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II for $209. I warn you though if you are serious about using a zoom for anything other than still shots you may end up feeling you wasted your money on this lens.
Also another thing to consider when you are looking at telephoto zooms is how much they weigh. These can weigh from 1.5 to over two pounds! If you plan on carrying one of these around as you walk your arm or shoulder/back (depending on camera bag) will get tired fast with one of the heavier lenses.
Additionally these lenses will usually be the first L lens you will buy. Unless you buy the above listed EF-S lens or an off-brand I do not list.
Personally I went with the EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM. It cost $1199 but that was because I wanted the IS for when I walk around with it when doing hand held portraits without a tripod. There is a cheaper version with out the IS is $678. It is the EF 70-200mm f/4 L. I’ve heard great things about these lenses.
You will notice these are slower lenses at f/4 so they are not the greatest for low light or indoors. For me this does not matter though as usually I can use flash to off set the f/4 aperture. If flash is not allowed then I will just use my EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM and get closer if possible.
Another reason I went with the f/4 IS is due to the weight. It is roughly the same weight as the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM at about 1.5 pounds so I am use to carrying it around already.
An alternative if you must have a f/2.8 aperture is the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM for $13249. Note those there is not IS on this version.
If you need f/2.8 and IS then take out a loan as the price jumps to $2199 for that version! Keep in mind both the f/2.8 zoom lenses are over two pounds in weight as well. Have fun carrying that around with the rest of your gear!
My advice though is to get either of the f/4 lenses and get use to how you will use them. If you need to upgrade to the f/2.8 later on, both the f/4 lenses can be resold for up to 95% of the price you bought them for. The last thing you need to do is buy a $2000+ lens and never use it because you leave it at home due to it feeling like you have a boat anchor in your bag.
Wide angle lenses are great for landscape photography to get those awesome wide vista shots. If you like to take landscapes I would suggest you get one of these two lenses below. You probably noticed that up to this point that I stuck with all Canon made lenses. This is more personal choice for me. However there are other brands such as Sigma and Tamron that make lenses to fit Canon bodies. Here is the only off brand lens I will recommend.
It is the Tamron AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 SP Di II LD. It goes for about $499.00 and has gotten many good reviews. The reason I recommend this lens is that the Canon version EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is about $200 more at $679.00. Optically the Canon is a little better but when it came to this purchase I wanted to save a little money for something else instead.
If you shoot a lot of landscapes now and have the money go for the Canon. If you are just wanting to try the waters of using a wide angle grab the Tamron and if you do not like it then return it to Amazon before the 30 day window closes or sell it on eBay.
If you like to shoot close ups with fine detail and lots of Bokeh in the background then macro lenses will deliver the results for you.
I have never used a macro and do not own one currently. However I didn’t want to leave them out of this list. For the budget conscious lens buyer there is only two options before you hit the L lens level.
First you have the EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM at $399 that will give you close to the equivalent focal length view of the the next lens on a full framed camera. On a crop sensor cameras this lens is known to deliver excellent macro images. I’ve seen some YouTube reviews that highly recommend this lens especially on a 60D or 7D camera.
The EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM costs more at $549 but it gives you two things to consider as an option you may want to purchase over the 60mm. First you can be farther away from your subject. This is especially nice when you are shooting insects. You have less changes of startling the little buggers. Second is that this lens is still usable if you upgrade to a full framed camera.
To end those are my recommendations on the lenses I feel you should look at purchasing for learning photography on a budget. I think having these gives you a nice rounded lens kit that allow you to take just about any type of shot you will want to take. Note though, there is no need to run out and buy all these lenses at one time. Take it slow and learn to shoot with what you have and make sure it really is the the equipment and not you that is preventing you from perfecting your shot. I can’t stress this enough when learning. Sometimes forcing yourself to work with what you have and not allow yourself to spend thousands of dollars on some “Uber” lens will teach you more than just letting the equipment do the work for you.
I hope this post helps you out in deciding what lenses you may want to buy first as you go on your path of learning photography. Feel free to leave comments on what lenses you bought and why in the comments section!
Thanks for Reading
*P.S. NOTE: Some argue buying a Prime as your first lens over a standard zoom is better because it makes you think about your composition more and forces you to move your body to get your framing instead of just zooming in and out with your lens as I noted above when talking about prime lenses. I do agree with this to a point but I think that as you learn to use your camera standard zooms allow you to get more keeper shots leading you to shoot more instead of getting frustrated with not getting as many keeper shots because you didn’t properly position yourself for the shot you wanted to get with using a prime. Sometimes primes can force you to over think or not let you get shots quick enough (especially around kids) when you have move to much to get the shot.
**P.P.S. NOTE: You can still purchase one if you are really strapped for cash. See links an kit lenses given.
***P.P.P.S. NOTE: I write these articles about one month ahead of time. I do not always update them once they are queued up to be published.
There was a question posted on the Digital Photography School Forums Recently from a person that travels and was a bit was concerned about justifying spending $1000+US for gear. The person was trying to justify the cost to themselves in thinking better gear equals gettng the best pictures the person could on their trip.
Here is the person’s question (paraphrased):
I have a Nikon 5100, 50mm 1.8 (which I love), and the two kit lenses 18-55 and 55-200.The 50 is so much sharper than the kits. I have a Manfrotto 190X tripod.
After spending the last hour using the search function here, I came up with the following
– Use the kit lens at f8 and a good tripod.
The kit lens gives me quite good images on the tripod, but not near the quality of the 50.
– 28mm 1.8
– an UW – Nikkor 10 -24 is 800$, Tokina 11-16 is 700$
I’m having trouble justifying a +1000$ lens for a hobbyist.
What lenses should I take. Should I purchase another lens to get a better image or having the 5100, is it not worth it?
Forum member Jason Gendreau had some great advice as a response that I wanted to share with everyone.
There is no magic lens / camera for anything. For every subject there is an infinite number of perspectives.
Long, medium, short focal lengths, low light, black and white, F/2, 2.8, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, Flash, natural light… I took a 2 hour trip up to “tops” (a mountain look out in Cebu Philippines, about 20 square meters and a nice view of the city) and that’s the equipment I used. I shot flowers, insects, environmental portrait with off camera flash, sweeping city vistas, a sunset, lovebirds, tourists, a chair, a radio tower, textured wall, architecture, patterns, a cup, a plant… When the sun went down I shot the city against a night sky. That’s the image I planned to get when i got there. Had I only taken the lens I needed to get the shot, I’d have missed out on 99% of the images I DIDN’T plan on getting while I was waiting for the light to be right for the one I did. I DID use every piece of equipment I had. No matter what you bring, you’ll find a way to use it to produce a unique image.
The quickest way to stifle your creativity and produce boring photos is to take one “do it all” kind of lens. Do it all, do nothing well. If your lens doesn’t do anything well, you’ll rarely get unique images
Notice I haven’t actually “named” any equipment that I used. Thats because equipment is largely incidental. I saw a subject i wanted to shoot and chose from what I had the best way I thought to shoot it. Had i not had that piece of equipment, I’d have chose a different way to shoot it. If I had no macro capability, I’d not have looked for macro shots, Had I no off camera flash, I’d have used on camera, or simply flash be damned. If I “had” to have flash and didn’t have it, I’d have used technique instead, Expose one frame for the person and another for the background and worked it out in post. Don’t forget post as a powerful way to AUGMENT your equipment ( not replace it ) Cameras have a crappy dynamic range. Knowing how to layer in post to increase dynamic range is ESSENTIAL skills. If you don’t know how, drop everything and learn it. You’ll be glad you did.
I will say this one more thing about equipment simply because you’re looking at perhaps buying some…
A great lens only does ONE thing well. If it does lots, it does nothing well. Look at your 55-200 for example. It has a fantastic focal range… but that’s it. its slow, not very sharp, the contrast is simply “ok”… even the build quality is nothing special. There is absolutely NOTHING this lens will give you that another lens couldn’t do better.
The 18-55 is the same.
Your 50mm 1.8 isn’t as versatile as the other 2 lenses in the least. You might think that because the lens isn’t as versatile, then its not worth taking on a trip. You’d be wrong. the lens might not be versatile, but it does one thing VERY WELL. Portraits. Its sharp, it has great bokeh, its good in dim light. All things the other two suck at. When you shoot a portrait with this lens, it will be a GOOD photo. (limited by your own skill of course) You could use either of the other lenses at 50mm and neither would take as nice a photo as the 50mm 1.8 because those lenses are medeocre. They exist only because newbies don’t understand lenses. Its easier (and more profitable) to just sell them a “one size fits all” lens and send them on their way.
I said all that to say this… When you go out to buy a lens, buy the lens that does the ONE THING best. Next time you buy another lens, buy another one that does ONE THING the best again. (probably one thing different than the last time ;D )
Eventually your going to have a selection of lenses that do awesome things. Then you can choose which lens you want to use for different kinds of images.
This is what I recommend for you on a trip like the one your planning…
Portrait lens. (it would be nice to have a high quality portrait zoom for controlling backgrounds, but they are expensive. The prime you have is good for portraits, but not “environmental portraits”. You’d need 3 prime lenses to cover environmental portraits well, or a high quality zoom… either way, not possible for this trip without spending lots of cash.) I recommend sticking with the prime for regular portraits, and the 18 -55 and 55-22 for environmental portraits. They wont look special, but you’ll have something anyway.
One ultra wide zoom. You mentioned the 10-24mm nikkor. Its a specialty lens for landscapes and very wide vistas. Its an EXCELLENT choice for landscapes and vistas. It does those extremely well. I don’t have one, but I’d imagine using it effectively will take some time and practice because its not a particularly good lens for anything else. You have to know what it does well, and only use it for that. Its part of knowing your gear, and its limitations. I think that this lens is the real reason the Canon to Nikon adapters actually exist lol, many professional Canon landscape photographers use this lens.
Macro… of some kind. I use extension tubes for my macro shots. Extension tubes are a much cheaper and much more versatile for close up and macro photography vs buying a dedicated macro lens. They work by allowing you to focus your lens much closer than normal. Any of your lenses can use the extension tubes, so they essentially make all your lenses macro lenses. Which is great when your on a budget and traveling. They have no optics, so they do not affect your image quality in any way. They will cause lens flaws to become more apparent though. Soft lenses will be even less sharp because your magnifying the problem. Your 50mm lens would make an awesome macro lens with extension tubes, though I’d not recommend the other two except in a pinch.
A GOOD LIGHT tripod. Absolutely essential for low light and landscapes. Ultra wide images are “typically” taken low to the ground to maximize the look of depth. Unless you want your knees to be perpetually dirty, get a tripod that sits very low. Lower than 12 inches.
A flash is always good to have, but not always so important while traveling.
If you were to buy the 10-24mm nikkor and a set of extension tubes, I would say you’d be pretty much set for equipment capable of producing magazine quality images. Not that I think you will, but what I mean is that you’d only be limited by your own ability.
You could use the 50mm for great portraits, the 10-24 for stunning landscapes and vistas and the 50mm with extension tubes for macro and close up shots. Anything else could be done with the 18-200mm lenses. they might be nothing special, but they do fill the gaps.
Also make sure you have a spare battery (or three) that way you can swap out a full batt and charge the other. I recently went on a trip to Romania for a month and had 4 full batteries when i arrived. I forgot my charger. I was able to shoot for 2 weeks before I had to hunt down a local photographer willing to fill them for me. he filled them, and I was set till I got home. I dont think you need 4 batts, but at LEAST one spare is essential. If you have to not buy the 10-24 or extension tubes in order to buy a spare… get the spare. Its that important.
Another important thing is the ability to dump your cards. Don’t say that your going to bring a dozen 8 gig cards and just fill them up because you will fill them all in 3 days and either have to start deleting or buy more. A laptop with a large capacity external drive is the way to go. or at the very least the external drive and card reader or camera cable. then you can borrow a computer at some point to clear the cards. Protect the external drive with your life.
I hope this huge post was worth your time to read, and good luck on your trip! It sounds like it’ll be a blast.
As you can see this is sound advice for anyone going on a vacation or holiday. Additionally it is also a great list of first lens types to buy as you learn photography. I say this second part because as you learn you need to try different types of photography. Don’t just stick to one type!
In a future week I will post a list of lens to complement this advise that a beginner can afford with out breaking the bank.
Thanks for Reading
I’m sure you have read either in books or online that there are several ways to get your images “tack sharp”. This post is not to rehash about how to do that or point you places to read about it.
This post is to give another place to find some basic Photoshop image sharpening settings for the Unsharp Mask Tool.
Here are the setting I tend to use as a starting guide:
Subject: Amount, Radius, Threshold
Soft Subject: 150,1,10
Moderate Sharpening: 225,0.5,0
Web Images*: 400,0.3,0
City Scapes: 65,3,2
*If you use Lightroom and export your images before uploading them you can just check the “Sharpen For:” box and select “Screen” from the drop down list.
If you are using Full Photoshop:
After you use the above go into the Edit Menu–> Fade Unsharp Mask. Set Mode to Luminosity and Adjust the Opacity lower until hallows in image go away (50% Usually)
If you are using Photoshop Elements it is a bit more complicated:
1. Duplicate the layer you want to apply the
filter to (unsharp mask in this case).
2. Apply one of the setting above as the filter settings to the duplicated layer.
3. Go to the top of the layers palette (panel)
and change the layer blending mode of the
duplicated layer to luminosity.
4. If the sharping is too strong, you can adjust
strength by using the opacity slider (also on top
in the layers panel).
5. If you have a bunch of layers underneath those two
layers, click on the duplicated layer to select it.
Then go to Layer-Group with Previous (Create Clipping
6. This groups the two layers together so the sharping doesn’t
affect the layers below.
Note that these are not “be all end all” settings. These are just guides to help you through post process a bit quicker. You will have to tweak them as needed for each image.
Thanks for reading
Various pictures that I took at the March, 2nd 3013 Special Olympics Polar Plunge for Charity.
I bundled up and went to a Special Olympic’s Polar Plunge Event and the event organizers allowed me to go out on the ice with their hired photographer to take pictures when I showed my NYIP Badge and asked if I could take pictures as a student photographer.
It was really fun to do it and wasn’t all that cold as we were blesses with a very light wind that didn’t always blow.
I switched between my 10-22mm and 17-55mm lens as the safety people wouldn’t not let me take my bag with me. So I had to stuff one lens into my life vest I was required to wear on the ice. I wish I had my 70-200mm but I couldn’t carry it.
I will be honest that I could have done better but I was more worried about staying warm and not getting wet as some groups where trying to really get the photogs wet! LOL